Endoscopic approaches to the orbit: Transnasal and transorbital, a retrospective case series
Brain and Spine, ISSN: 2772-5294, Vol: 4, Page: 102770
2024
- 2Citations
- 5Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef2
- Captures5
- Readers5
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Research Data from Neurosurgery Unit Update Understanding of Neurology (Endoscopic approaches to the orbit: Transnasal and transorbital, a retrospective case series)
2024 MAR 11 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at NewsRx Medical Devices Daily -- Fresh data on neurology are presented in a
Article Description
Orbital pathologies requiring surgery are traditionally treated by open approach with different techniques depending on the lesion location. Recently, minimally invasive endoscopic approaches, such as the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach (EEA) and the Endoscopic Transorbital Approach (ETA) have been introduced in orbital surgery. The purpose of this study is to report the combined experience of the Neurosurgical and Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) Units in the endoscopic approach of orbital pathologies. We retrospectively retrieved data on patients treated at our Institution between 2016 and 2021 with endoscopic approach for orbital pathologies. The Clavien-Dindo classification and the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale have been used to assess complications and cosmetic outcomes. 39 patients met the inclusion criteria. EEA (15 patients) or ETA (20 patients) were chosen to approach the lesions. In three cases we used a combination of endoscopic and anterior orbitotomy and in one patient a combination of EEA + ETA. The type of procedure performed was orbital biopsy (9 cases), orbital decompression (6 cases), subtotal resection of the lesion (STR) (8 cases) and total resection of the lesion (GTR) (16 cases). The more frequent postoperative complications were diplopia (5.1%, with 1 case of permanent diplopia), trigeminal paraesthesia and dysesthesia (5.1%), palpebral edema (17.9%), periorbital ecchymosis (7.7%). Mean follow up time was 21 months (range 2–63 months). Endoscopic approaches to orbital compartments provide minimally invasive access to every orbital compartment with low complications rate and good cosmetic outcome.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000262; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.102770; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85185815822&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38510598; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2772529424000262; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.102770
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know