Genomic instability, driver genes and cell selection: Projections from cancer to stem cells
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, ISSN: 1874-9399, Vol: 1849, Issue: 4, Page: 427-435
2015
- 19Citations
- 67Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef14
- Captures67
- Readers67
- 67
Review Description
Cancer cells and stem cells share many traits, including a tendency towards genomic instability. Human cancers exhibit tumor-specific genomic aberrations, which often affect their malignancy and drug response. During their culture propagation, human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) also acquire characteristic genomic aberrations, which may have significant impact on their molecular and cellular phenotypes. These aberrations vary in size from single nucleotide alterations to copy number alterations to whole chromosome gains. A prominent challenge in both cancer and stem cell research is to identify “driver aberrations” that confer a selection advantage, and “driver genes” that underlie the recurrence of these aberrations. Following principles that are already well-established in cancer research, candidate driver genes have also been suggested in hPSCs. Experimental validation of the functional role of such candidates can uncover whether these are bona fide driver genes. The identification of driver genes may bring us closer to a mechanistic understanding of the genomic instability of stem cells. Guided by terminologies and methodologies commonly applied in cancer research, such understanding may have important ramifications for both stem cell and cancer biology. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Stress as a fundamental theme in cell plasticity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874939914002235; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.08.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84924231688&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25132386; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1874939914002235; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.08.005; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874939914002235?via%3Dihub
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know