Acute, post-ischemic sensorimotor deficits correlate positively with infarct size but fail to predict its occurrence and magnitude after middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats
Behavioural Brain Research, ISSN: 0166-4328, Vol: 216, Issue: 1, Page: 29-35
2011
- 16Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- CrossRef16
- 16
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
Article Description
This study investigated whether sensorimotor deficits measured soon after reperfusion could predict the occurrence and magnitude of cerebral infarct following middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Rats were subjected to left MCAO for 2 h according to the intraluminal thread method. At 0, 1, 2, and 3 h after reperfusion, the animals were examined for neurological deficits using an expanded scale comprising the following tests: (A) postural reflex, (B) circling motion, (C) falling to contralateral side, (D) placement of the contralateral forelimb during motion, and (E) general state of alertness or consciousness. Deficits were graded from 0 (normal) to 2 or 3 (severe), and the final neuro-score was a summation of these scores over the various time points and among the various tests. The neuro-score of the animals that survived up to 24 h after MCAO ranged from 0 to 8.2 and positively correlated with infarct size ( p = 0.0002–0.001). However, at least three animals with moderate neuro-scores (4.5–6.0) did not exhibit any sign of infarcted brain tissue. Other animals having a distinct neuro-score (3.2 and 8.2, respectively) exhibited cerebral infarct with the same size (235 mm 3 ). These data indicate that the extent of neurological deficit assessed within the first 3 h after reperfusion does not reliably correspond to the occurrence and magnitude of cerebral infarct. Therefore, the neuro-score, when measured acutely within the first few hours after reperfusion, does not serve as a reliable criterion for preselecting animals with similar infarct size following transient MCAO.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432810004705; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.06.026; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78149410931&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20600339; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166432810004705; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.06.026
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know