Corrigendum to “Human aryl-hydrocarbon receptor and its interaction with dioxin and physiological ligands investigated by molecular modeling and docking simulations” [Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 413 (2011) 176–181]
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, ISSN: 0006-291X, Vol: 418, Issue: 4, Page: 852
2012
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Correction Description
The authors regret the following errors in the published paper: Due to modifications inserted by automatic formatting during the preparation of the manuscript, Fig. 1 included a wrong alignment of the row number 6 (containing stars and points) under the previous lines. The correct alignment of symbols under the sequences is reported here. The correct header and description of Table 2 is: Summary of the results from blind and focused docking simulations. Blind docking identified the putative binding site(s) for each ligand (reported in the column 2). Focused docking on these sites gave us a refined evaluation of energies, clusters and residues interacting with each ligand (reported in columns 3–5). In the last column of the same table, amino acid D388 is erroneously indicated as D389.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X12001611; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.01.114; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84857442879&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006291X12001611; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.01.114
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know