P16ink4a overexpression ameliorates cardiac remodeling of mouse following myocardial infarction via CDK4/pRb pathway
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, ISSN: 0006-291X, Vol: 595, Page: 62-68
2022
- 10Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef3
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
P16ink4a can accumulate in senescent cells and can be induced by different oncogenic stimulations. These functions make p16ink4a a biomarker of senescence and cancer. However, the exact role of p16ink4a remains unclear in cardiovascular disease. This study was aimed to investigate the role of p16ink4a in cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI). In vivo, gain and loss of function experiments using p16ink4a overexpression and knockdown adenovirus were induced to determine the effect of p16ink4a on cardiac structure and function after MI. The in vitro effects of p16ink4a were evaluated by overexpression and knockdown adenovirus of p16ink4a on isolated neonatal mouse cardiac myocytes (NMCMs) and neonatal mouse cardiac fibroblasts (NMCFs). Expression level of p16ink4a was increased after MI and enriched in the infarction area. In vivo, overexpression of p16ink4a protected, while knockdown of p16ink4a worsened cardiac function. In vitro, p16ink4a did not influence the hypertrophy of NMCMs. Overexpression of p16ink4a inhibited the proliferation and migration of NMCFs and reduced the level of collagen I and α-SMA. Consistently, knockdown of p16ink4a in vitro displayed the opposite effects. Further mechanism studies revealed that p16ink4a affected the expression level of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (pRb), which could be a potential pathway in regulating cardiac remodeling after MI. Overexpression of 16ink4a in cardiac fibroblasts can ameliorate cardiac dysfunction and attenuate pathological cardiac remodeling in mice after MI by regulating the p16ink4a/CDK4/pRb pathway.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X22000973; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.01.077; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123742948&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093641; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006291X22000973; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.01.077
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know