Replicon hypothesis revisited
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, ISSN: 0006-291X, Vol: 633, Page: 77-80
2022
- 1Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Nearly 70 years after the proposal of semiconservative replication of generic material by Watson and Crick, we now understand many of the proteins involved in the replication of host chromosomes and how they operate. The initiator and replicator, proposed in the replicon hypothesis, are now well defined in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. On the other hand, studies in prokaryotes and Archaea indicate alternative modes of initiation, which may not depend on an initiator. Here I summarize recent progress in the field of DNA replication and discuss the evolution of replication systems.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X2201316X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.09.060; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85141280964&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344169; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006291X2201316X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.09.060
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know