IRES-mediated translation in bacteria
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, ISSN: 0006-291X, Vol: 641, Page: 110-115
2023
- 1Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Despite the similarity in fundamental goals of translation initiation between different domains of life, it is one of the most phylogenetically diverse steps of the central dogma of molecular biology. In a classical view, the translation signals for prokaryotes and eukaryotes are distinct from each other. This idea was challenged by the finding that the Internal Ribosome Entry Site (IRES) belonging to Plautia stali intestine virus (PSIV) could bypass the domain-specific boundaries and effectively initiate translation in E. coli. This finding led us to investigate whether the ability of PSIV IRES to initiate translation in E. coli is specific to this IRES and also to study features that allow this viral IRES to mediate prokaryotic translation initiation. We observed that certain IRESs may also possess the ability to initiate E. coli translation. Our results also indicated that the structural integrity of the PSIV IRES in translation in prokaryotes does not appear to be as critical as it is in eukaryotes. We also demonstrated that two regions of the PSIV IRES with complementarity to 16S ribosomal RNA are important for the ability of this IRES to initiate translation in E. coli.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X22016874; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.12.022; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143977579&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527744; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006291X22016874; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.12.022
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know