An Improved CycleGAN for Data Augmentation in Person Re-Identification
Big Data Research, ISSN: 2214-5796, Vol: 34, Page: 100409
2023
- 4Citations
- 7Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
New Findings from Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications in Big Data Provides New Insights (An Improved Cyclegan for Data Augmentation In Person Re-identification)
2023 DEC 05 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Information Technology Daily -- Current study results on Information Technology - Big Data
Article Description
Person re-identification (ReID) has attracted more and more attention, which is to retrieve interested persons across multiple non-overlapping cameras. Matching the same person between different camera styles has always been an enormous challenge. In the existing work, cross-camera styles images generated by the cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (CycleGAN) only transfer the camera resolution and ambient lighting. The generated images produce considerable redundancy and inappropriate pictures at the same time. Although the data is added to prevent over-fitting, it also makes significant noise, so the accuracy is not significantly improved. In this paper, an improved CycleGAN is proposed to generate images for achieving improved data augmentation. The transfer of pedestrian posture is added at the same time as transferring the image style. It not only increases the diversity of pedestrian posture but also reduces the domain gap caused by the style change between cameras. Besides, through the multi-pseudo regularized label (MpRL), the generated images are assigned virtual tags dynamically in training. Through many experimental evaluations, we have achieved a very high identification accuracy on Market-1501, DukeMTMC-reID, and CUHK03-NP datasets. On the three datasets, the quantitative results of mAP are 96.20%, 93.72%, and 86.65%, and the quantitative results of rank-1 are 98.27%, 95.37%, and 90.71%, respectively. The experimental results fully show the superiority of our proposed method.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214579623000424; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2023.100409; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85171474628&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214579623000424; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2023.100409
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know