Co-culture of microalgae and enriched nitrifying bacteria for energy-efficient nitrification
Biochemical Engineering Journal, ISSN: 1369-703X, Vol: 152, Page: 107385
2019
- 37Citations
- 84Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of using microalgae as an oxygen supplier for nitrification. In order to measure oxygen demands of nitrification, the activated sludge were cultured in a selective medium for 150 days, and enriched nitrifying biomass was successfully obtained. The enriched nitrifiers were used to estimate oxygen demands for nitrification and used for co-culturing with microalgae. Oxygen transfer rates (OTR) were also measured for various mixing conditions to determine if mixing without forced aeration could satisfy oxygen demands of nitrification. For all mixing conditions, OTR were lower than the oxygen uptake rates (OUR) of nitrifiers. As a result, nitrification without forced aeration was incomplete due to oxygen deficiency. Meanwhile, oxygen production rates (OPR) of 6 microalgae species were measured, and it was demonstrated that C. vulgaris, S quadricauda, D. communism and C. emersonii could supply sufficient oxygen for nitrification at all mixing modes. Based on these results, 4 species of microalgae with sufficient oxygen supplying capabilities were selected for co-culturing with enriched nitrifiers, and full nitrification was accomplished without forced aeration. Finally, the electric energy of co-culture was estimated and showed that energy consumption by co-culture was lower than that of aerated nitrifiers.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369703X19303249; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2019.107385; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85073015058&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1369703X19303249; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1369703X19303249?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1369703X19303249?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2019.107385
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know