Principles of osteoporotic fracture treatment
Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, ISSN: 1521-6942, Vol: 27, Issue: 6, Page: 757-769
2013
- 50Citations
- 77Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations50
- Citation Indexes49
- 49
- CrossRef33
- Clinical Citations1
- 1
- Captures77
- Readers77
- 77
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes of Augmentation in Fragility Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Treatment; AFIF
STUDY INFORMATION OFFICIAL TITLE: Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes of Augmentation in Fragility Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Treatment: A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial CURRENT STATUS: Unknown status
Review Description
The number of osteoporotic fractures is still increasing and the overall management of these multimorbid patients is demanding. Surgical management of these fractures is challenging due to often comminuted fractures and poor purchase of implants. New implants and some with add-on possibilities such as standardized cement augmentation have been developed to address these problems. With these technical innovations the overall patient outcome can be improved. This review describes general considerations in operative treatment of osteoporotic fractures and gives recommendations for a selection of frequent fracture types.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521694214000175; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2014.02.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84901188316&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24836334; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1521694214000175; http://www.bprclinrheum.com/article/S1521-6942(14)00017-5/abstract
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know