Porous gelatin microsphere-based scaffolds containing MC3T3-E1 cells and calcitriol for the repair of skull defect
Biomaterials Advances, ISSN: 2772-9508, Vol: 138, Page: 212964
2022
- 9Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
There is an increasing demand for biomaterials with skull regeneration for clinical application. However, most of the current skull repair materials still have limitations, such as inadequate sources, poor cell adherence, differentiation, tissue infiltration, and foreign body sensation. Therefore, this study developed porous microsphere-based scaffolds containing mouse embryonic osteoblast precursor cells (MC3T3-E1 cells) and calcitriol (Cal) using gelatin and gelatin/hydroxyapatite through green freeze-crosslinking and freeze-drying. Gelatin was employed to prepare porous microspheres with a particle size of 100-300 μm, containing open pores of 2-70 μm and interconnected paths. Furthermore, the addition of Cal to porous gelatin microsphere-based scaffolds containing MC3T3-E1 cells (PGMSs-MC) and porous gelatin/hydroxyapatite composite microspheres containing MC3T3-E1 cells (HPGMSs-MC) improved their osteoinductivity and cell proliferation and promoted the formation of mature and well-organized bone. The developed Cal-HPGMSs-MC and Cal-PGMSs-MC displayed a good porous structure and cytocompatibility, histocompatibility, osteoconductivity, and osteoinduction. Thus, the designed scaffolds provide a promising prospect for tissue-engineered constructs with skull growth and integration, laying a foundation for further research on the reconstruction of skull defects.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772950822002412; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212964; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85132162293&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35913236; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2772950822002412; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212964
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know