PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Selecting cost-effective plant mixes to support pollinators

Biological Conservation, ISSN: 0006-3207, Vol: 217, Page: 195-202
2018
  • 38
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 124
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 1
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    38
    • Citation Indexes
      37
    • Policy Citations
      1
      • Policy Citation
        1
  • Captures
    124
  • Mentions
    1
    • News Mentions
      1
      • News
        1
  • Social Media
    1
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      1
      • Facebook
        1

Most Recent News

Carbon farming can enhance pollinator resources

Aizen MA, Garibaldi LA, Cunningham SA, et al. How much does agriculture depend on pollinators? Lessons from long-term trends in crop production. Ann Bot-London. 2009.

Article Description

Growing concern about wild and managed pollinator populations has led to efforts to create floral habitat to promote bees and other pollinators, especially in agricultural lands where they make important contributions to crop pollination. These actions all require practitioners to determine what mixture of plant species to select to best support diverse and functionally important pollinators. Like in the selection of areas for nature reserves, plant choices must balance function against differences in cost. To date, plant mixes have been compiled using expert opinion based on the performance of individual species, but researchers and practitioners have called for a systematic approach to optimize mixtures. We applied a decision analytic approach to select best flowering mixes to meet two specified objectives at the least cost: maximizing total bee richness or maximizing crop-pollinating bees. The model identified best plant mixes for each objective across a range of budgets. Accounting for the variation in costs among plant species allowed for substantially more cost effective mixes with little loss in achieving the target objective. Including multiple objectives simultaneously revealed the power of the approach to meet complex goals. The resulting mix supported over 96% of the bee species for both goals at no difference in cost. This gain in efficiency could dramatically increase the extent of habitat implemented and remove financial barriers to adoption by stakeholders and conservation practitioners.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know