Entomopathogenic nematodes as biological control agent against Bactrocera zonata and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Biological Control, ISSN: 1049-9644, Vol: 163, Page: 104706
2021
- 17Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We evaluated ten different species of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, H. megidis, H. georgiana, H. floridensis, H. indica, Steinernema carpocapsae, S. riobrave, S. feltiae, S. rarum and S. glaseri against different developmental stages i.e. larvae, pupae and adults of fruit flies species Bactrocera zonata and Bactrocera dorsalis. In addition to this broad virulence screening in the laboratory, we also conducted the first field tests measuring the potential for EPNs to control B. zonata and B. dorsalis. In a Petri plate assays targeting adult insects, all EPN species caused different levels of mortality with maximums of 81.18% and 73.64% caused by H. bacteriophora 72 h after exposure in B. zonata and B. dorsalis, respectively. All the EPN species caused infection with the lowest survival levels observed in H. bacteriophora treatments against B. zonata and B. dorsalis. In a long-term exposure bioassay, both larvae and pupae were susceptible to all the EPN species with maximum mortalities caused by H. bacteriophora at 93.06% and 85.93% and 66.71% and 58.50% against larvae and pupae of B. zonata and B. dorsalis, respectively. In a potted soil bioassay, both developmental stages were found susceptible to the different EPN species, but again H. bacteriophora caused the highest levels of mortality; 95.74% and 86.88% in larvae and 71.27% and 67.65% in pupae of B. zonata and B. dorsalis, respectively. Clear dose response relationships were found in four EPNs ( H. bacteriophora, S. carpocapsae, S. riobrave, S. feltiae ) against larvae, pupae and adult B. zonata and B. dorsalis; the dose–response assays also confirmed superior virulence in H. bacteriophora relative to other EPN species. In a fruit exposure bioassay under laboratory condition, all EPN species were lethal towards larvae even inside the fruit and also in soil with maximum mortalities caused by H. bacteriophora in both fly species. Under greenhouse conditions, the lowest adult emergences (ranging from 19% to 52%) were observed in H. bacteriophora treatments when EPNs were exposed as larvae and pupae of B. zonata and B. dorsalis. Under field conditions, the same EPN species were tested and all the species significantly reduced adult fly emergence, but the lowest adult emergence was observed when using H. bacteriophora (25.06% and 31.53% in B. zonata and B. dorsalis, respectively). In the field, EPNs performed better in artificially infested fruit with mortalities of 47.18% and 42.03% as compared to natural infested fruit with mortalities of 36.88% and 30.86% in B. zonata and B. dorsalis, respectively. Our results indicate that EPNs could be part of an integrated pest management program for control of soil inhabiting stages of fruit fly complexes in orchard systems of Pakistan.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964421001754; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104706; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85113720793&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1049964421001754; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104706
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know