On the R -curve behavior of human tooth enamel
Biomaterials, ISSN: 0142-9612, Vol: 30, Issue: 23, Page: 4037-4046
2009
- 176Citations
- 141Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations176
- Citation Indexes176
- 176
- CrossRef155
- Captures141
- Readers141
- 141
Article Description
In this study the crack growth resistance behavior and fracture toughness of human tooth enamel were quantified using incremental crack growth measures and conventional fracture mechanics. Results showed that enamel undergoes an increase in crack growth resistance (i.e. rising R -curve) with crack extension from the outer to the inner enamel, and that the rise in toughness is a function of distance from the dentin enamel junction (DEJ). The outer enamel exhibited the lowest apparent toughness (0.67 ± 0.12 MPa m 0.5 ), and the inner enamel exhibited a rise in the growth toughness from 1.13 MPa m 0.5 /mm to 3.93 MPa m 0.5 /mm. The maximum crack growth resistance at fracture (i.e. fracture toughness ( K c )) ranged from 1.79 to 2.37 MPa m 0.5. Crack growth in the inner enamel was accompanied by a host of mechanisms operating from the micro- to the nano-scale. Decussation in the inner enamel promoted crack deflection and twist, resulting in a reduction of the local stress intensity at the crack tip. In addition, extrinsic mechanisms such as bridging by unbroken ligaments of the tissue and the organic matrix promoted crack closure. Microcracking due to loosening of prisms was also identified as an active source of energy dissipation. In summary, the unique microstructure of enamel in the decussated region promotes crack growth toughness that is approximately three times that of dentin and over ten times that of bone.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014296120900413X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.017; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67349123671&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19427691; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S014296120900413X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.017
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know