Cells, scaffolds, and bioactive factors: Engineering strategies for improving regeneration following volumetric muscle loss
Biomaterials, ISSN: 0142-9612, Vol: 278, Page: 121173
2021
- 56Citations
- 72Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations56
- Citation Indexes56
- 56
- CrossRef25
- Captures72
- Readers72
- 72
Review Description
Severe traumatic skeletal muscle injuries, such as volumetric muscle loss (VML), result in the obliteration of large amounts of skeletal muscle and lead to permanent functional impairment. Current clinical treatments are limited in their capacity to regenerate damaged muscle and restore tissue function, promoting the need for novel muscle regeneration strategies. Advances in tissue engineering, including cell therapy, scaffold design, and bioactive factor delivery, are promising solutions for VML therapy. Herein, we review tissue engineering strategies for regeneration of skeletal muscle, development of vasculature and nerve within the damaged muscle, and achievements in immunomodulation following VML. In addition, we discuss the limitations of current state of the art technologies and perspectives of tissue-engineered bioconstructs for muscle regeneration and functional recovery following VML.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961221005305; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121173; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116364577&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34619561; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142961221005305; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121173
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know