Integrating wet stirred-bead milling for Tetraselmis suecica biorefinery: Operating parameters influence and specific energy efficiency
Bioresource Technology, ISSN: 0960-8524, Vol: 394, Page: 130181
2024
- 4Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Stirred bead milling proved to be an efficient cell destruction technique in a biorefinery unit for the extraction of over 95 % of proteins and 60 % of carbohydrates from the green marine microalga Tetraselmis suecica. Optimum conditions, expressed in terms of metabolite yield and energy consumption, were found for average values of bead size and agitator rotation speed. The higher the microalgae concentration, up to 100 g.L −1, which is adequate for biofilm algae growth in an industrial unit, the more efficient the cell destruction process. Cell destruction rates and metabolite extraction yields are similar in pendular and recycling modes, but the pendular configuration reduces the residence time of the suspension in the grinding chamber, which is less costly. With regard to the cell destruction mechanism, it was concluded that bead shocks first damage cells by permeabilizing them, and that after a longer period, all cells are shredded and destroyed, forming elongated debris.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852423016097; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.130181; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85180539385&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38109980; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960852423016097; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.130181
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know