Zipf’s law in phonograms and Weibull distribution in ideograms: comparison of English with Japanese
Biosystems, ISSN: 0303-2647, Vol: 73, Issue: 2, Page: 131-139
2004
- 10Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef8
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Frequency distribution of word usage in a word sequence generated by capping is estimated in terms of the number of “hits” in retrieval of web-pages, to evaluate structure of semantics proper not to a particular text but to a language. Especially we compare distribution of English sequences with Japanese ones and obtain that, for English and Japanese phonogram, frequency of word usage against rank follows power-law function with exponent 1 and, for Japanese ideogram, it follows stretched exponential (Weibull distribution) function. We also discuss that such a difference can result from difference of phonogram based- (English) and ideogram-based language (Japanese).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303264703002260; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2003.11.002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0842328616&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15013225; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0303264703002260; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2003.11.002
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know