Post-treatment of swine wastewater using aerobic granular sludge: Granulation, microbiota development, and performance
Bioresource Technology Reports, ISSN: 2589-014X, Vol: 16, Page: 100862
2021
- 7Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We studied the applicability of aerobic granular sludge (AGS) technology in association with upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors for swine wastewater (SWW) treatment. Granule formation, long-term operational evaluation, and the system performance for simultaneous C, N, and P removals were assessed. Finally, the AGS microbial changes were evaluated by metagenomic analysis. Aerobic granulation occurred after 54 days of operation, and 81% of the granules had a diameter above 1.0 mm after 96 days of the experiment. The granules formed were spherical, had cohesive structure and good sedimentation capacity, although they were classified as non-resistant. After the sludge granulation (steady-state), high COD, BOD and ammonia removals were found, although the removals of TN and TP were considered moderate. Nonetheless, overall, a good operational stability was achieved. The metagenomic analysis revealed that the microbial groups suffered great influence from the substrate characteristics, but they are commonly found in AGS systems.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X21002401; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100862; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122751005&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2589014X21002401; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100862
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know