Assessing causal relationship from gut microbiota to heel bone mineral density
Bone, ISSN: 8756-3282, Vol: 143, Page: 115652
2021
- 25Citations
- 30Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations25
- Citation Indexes25
- 25
- CrossRef8
- Captures30
- Readers30
- 30
Article Description
Recent studies have demonstrated the important role played by gut microbiota in regulating bone development, but the evidence of such causal relationship is still sparse in human population. The aim of this study is to assess the causal relationship from gut microbiota to bone development and to identify specific causal bacteria taxa via a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistic based two-sample MR analysis was performed. Summary statistics of microbiome GWAS (MGWAS) in 1126 twin pairs of the TwinsUK study was used as discovery sample, and the MGWAS in 984 Dutch participants from the LifeLines-DEEP cohort was used as replication sample. Estimated heel bone mineral density (eBMD) GWAS in 426,824 participants from the UK biobank (UKB) cohort was used as outcome. Bacteria were grouped into taxa features at both order and family levels. In the discovery sample, a total of 25 bacteria features including 9 orders and 16 families were analyzed. Fourteen features (5 orders + 9 families) were nominally significant, including 5 orders ( Bacteroidales, Clostridiales, Lactobacillales, Pasteurellales and Verrucomicrobiales ) and 9 families ( Bacteroidaceae, Clostridiaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Mogibacteriaceae, Pasteurellaceae, Porphyromonadaceae, Streptococcaceae, Verrucomicrobiaceae and Veillonellaceae ). One order Clostridiales and its child taxon, family Lachnospiraceae, were successfully replicated in the replication sample ( Clostridiales P discovery = 3.32 × 10 −3 P replication = 7.29 × 10 −3 ; Lachnospiraceae P discovery = 0.03 P replication = 7.29 × 10 −3 ). Our findings provided evidence of causal relationship from microbiota to bone development, as well as identified specific bacteria taxa that regulated bone mass variation, thus providing new insights into the microbiota mediated bone development mechanism.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8756328220304324; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2020.115652; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85091802591&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32971307; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S8756328220304324; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2020.115652
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know