Derivation, validation, and prediction of loading-induced mineral apposition rates at endocortical and periosteal bone surfaces based on fluid velocity and pore pressure
Bone Reports, ISSN: 2352-1872, Vol: 19, Page: 101729
2023
- 10Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Research Reports from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Ropar Provide New Insights into Bone Research (Derivation, validation, and prediction of loading-induced mineral apposition rates at endocortical and periosteal bone surfaces based on ...)
2023 DEC 20 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Health & Medicine Daily -- Current study results on bone research have been
Article Description
The capacity of bone to optimize its structure in response to mechanical loads has been widely observed. The mechanical load acting on a bone at the macroscopic level influences the bone cells, particularly osteocytes within the lacunae canalicular network (LCN). Osteocytes are responsive to a range of physical signals, including strain, interstitial fluid flow, and pore pressure. However, physiological tissue strain is known to be typically smaller than that required to directly induce bone formation. On the other hand, as per evidence provided by this study from the literature, models based on fluid flow alone cannot simultaneously predict bone formation at both the periosteal and endocortical surfaces. This suggests that another component of the osteocyte's mechanical environment, such as pore pressure, may play an essential role in bone adaptation, either alone or in combination with other stimuli, such as tissue strain and/or interstitial fluid flow. In vitro experiments have also confirmed that osteocytes respond to cyclic pore pressure and, thus, have a mechanism to sense the pressure, possibly because of its viscoelasticity. In this work, dissipation energy density, being irreversible work done per unit volume, has been successfully used as a greater stimulus to incorporate all of the parameters of mechanical environments of the LCN, such as waveforms of both fluid velocity and pore pressure, number of loading cycles. Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) has also been mathematically derived to be proportional to the square root of the dissipation energy density minus its reference value. A hypothesis is accordingly proposed and successfully tested/validated for both endocortical and periosteal surfaces with respect to an in-vivo study on mouse tibia available in the literature. The constant of proportionality and the reference/threshold value of the dissipation energy density are determined through a nonlinear curve fitting. The mathematical/computational method thus developed is then successfully used to predict MAR at both endocortical and periosteal surfaces induced by a different loading condition. Computational implementation of the mathematical model has been done through a poroelastic finite element analysis of bone, where bone is assumed to be porous and filled with fluid, with a boundary condition that the periosteum is impermeable to the fluid and the endosteal surface maintains a reference zero pressure. This work also provides evidence for these assumptions to be true based on the state-of-the-art literature on related experimental studies. The currently developed model shows that the bone uses these conditions (assumptions) to its advantage, as the greater stimulus, i.e., the dissipation energy due to both fluid flow and pore pressure, are of a similar order at both the surfaces, and hence osteogenesis of the same order at both the surfaces. As a bottom line, the resulting model is the first of its kind as it has been able to correctly predict MAR at both endocortical and periosteal surfaces. This study thus significantly advances the modeling of cortical bone adaptation to exogenous mechanical loading.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235218722300075X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2023.101729; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85178119567&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38089647; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S235218722300075X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2023.101729
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know