The Rome IV: Irritable bowel syndrome - A functional disorder
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, ISSN: 1521-6918, Vol: 40, Page: 101634
2019
- 38Citations
- 119Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations38
- Citation Indexes38
- 38
- CrossRef25
- Captures119
- Readers119
- 119
Review Description
Functional gastrointestinal disorders are the most common disorders encountered in the clinical gastroenterology setting. Over the years the Rome process has generated consensus definitions of functional gastrointestinal disorders, and given diagnostic criteria, based on various symptom patterns, that have evolved over the years. The latest Rome IV consensus was presented in May 2016. This summary points out some of the important changes made from the Rome III 2006 consensus including evaluation of symptoms from the stand-point of basal normative values and disorders of gut-brain interaction, as well as additions of the importance of the microflora. However, we are all aware of the fact that there are limitations, and the Rome consensus does not pick up all patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Out of those that seek medical help for their functional gastrointestinal symptoms additional outlines of disease have to be considered and judgements made on the patients’ actual symptoms, or rather presentation of their symptoms. The Rome IV consensus is a robust standard for a clinical and research approach to functional gastrointestinal disorders, but might be improved by use of exclusion criteria and additional biochemical biomarkers in order to accurately diagnose those patients who may achieve relief by an extended treatment approach in the clinical setting of gastroenterology. A biopsychosocial approach to the patient is recommended to improve compliance and optimize treatment and outcomes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152169181930037X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2019.101634; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85072875537&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31594650; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S152169181930037X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2019.101634
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know