Neural network informed photon filtering reduces fluorescence correlation spectroscopy artifacts
Biophysical Journal, ISSN: 0006-3495, Vol: 123, Issue: 6, Page: 745-755
2024
- 3Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef3
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) techniques are well-established tools to investigate molecular dynamics in confocal and super-resolution microscopy. In practice, users often need to handle a variety of sample- or hardware-related artifacts, an example being peak artifacts created by bright, slow-moving clusters. Approaches to address peak artifacts exist, but measurements suffering from severe artifacts are typically nonanalyzable. Here, we trained a one-dimensional U-Net to automatically identify peak artifacts in fluorescence time series and then analyzed the purified, nonartifactual fluctuations by time-series editing. We show that, in samples with peak artifacts, the transit time and particle number distributions can be restored in simulations and validated the approach in two independent biological experiments. We propose that it is adaptable for other FCS artifacts, such as detector dropout, membrane movement, or photobleaching. In conclusion, this simulation-based, automated, open-source pipeline makes measurements analyzable that previously had to be discarded and extends every FCS user’s experimental toolbox.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349524001322; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.02.012; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85186357442&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38384131; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006349524001322; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.02.012
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know