Computational pipeline for the generation and validation of patient-specific mechanical models of brain development
Brain Multiphysics, ISSN: 2666-5220, Vol: 3, Page: 100045
2022
- 6Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The human brain develops from a smooth cortical surface in early stages of fetal life to a convoluted one postnatally, creating an organized ensemble of folds. Abnormal folding patterns are linked to neurodevelopmental disorders. However, the complex multi-scale interactions involved in cortical folding are not fully known yet. Computational models of brain development have contributed to better understand the process of cortical folding, but still leave several questions unanswered. A major limitation of the existing models is that they have basically been applied to synthetic examples or simplified brain anatomies. However, the integration of patient-specific longitudinal imaging data is key for improving the realism of simulations. In this work we present a complete computational pipeline to build and validate patient-specific mechanical models of brain development. Starting from the processing of fetal brain magnetic resonance images (MRI), personalised finite-element 3D meshes were generated, in which biomechanical models were run to simulate brain development. Several metrics were then employed to compare simulation results with neonatal images from the same subjects, on a common reference space. We applied the computational pipeline to a cohort of 29 subjects where fetal and neonatal MRI were available, including controls and ventriculomegaly cases. The neonatal brain simulations had several sulcal patterns similar to the ones observed in neonatal MRI data. However, the pipeline also revealed some limitations of the evaluated mechanical model and the importance of including patient-specific cortical thickness as well as regional and anisotropic growth to obtain more realistic and personalised brain development models. Statement of Significance: Computational modelling has emerged as a powerful tool to study the complex process of brain development during gestation. However, most of the studies performed so far have been carried out in synthetic or two-dimensional geometries due to the difficulties involved in processing real fetal data. Moreover, as there is no correspondence between meshes, comparing them or assessing whether they are realistic or not is not a trivial task. In this work we present a complete computational pipeline to build and validate patient-specific mechanical models of brain development, mainly based on open-source tools.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666522022000028; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brain.2022.100045; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127014559&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666522022000028; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brain.2022.100045
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know