Does PKM(zeta) maintain memory?
Brain Research Bulletin, ISSN: 0361-9230, Vol: 105, Page: 36-45
2014
- 43Citations
- 141Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations43
- Citation Indexes43
- 43
- CrossRef39
- Captures141
- Readers141
- 141
- Mentions2
- Blog Mentions2
- 2
Most Recent Blog
RNA memory hypothesis
RNA memory hypothesis Posted in brainz, Open problems by Scott Locklin on February 3, 2021 There’s an old theory that memory is actually encoded in
Review Description
Work on the long-term stability of memory has identified a potentially critical role for protein kinase Mzeta (PKMζ) in maintaining established memory. PKMζ, an autonomously active isoform of PKC, is hypothesized to sustain those changes that occurred during memory formation in order to preserve the memory engram over time. Initial studies investigating the role of PKMζ were largely successful in demonstrating a role for the kinase in memory maintenance; disrupting PKMζ activity with ζ-inhibitory peptide (ZIP) was successful in disrupting a variety of established associations in a number of key brain regions. More recent work, however, has questioned both the role of PKMζ in memory maintenance and the effectiveness of ZIP as a specific inhibitor of PKMζ activity. Here, we outline the research both for and against the idea that PKMζ is a memory maintenance mechanism and discuss how these two lines of research can be reconciled. We conclude by proposing a number of studies that would help to clarify the role of PKMζ in memory and define other mechanisms the brain may use to maintain memory.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361923013001445; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.09.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84901495318&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24076105; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0361923013001445; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.09.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know