Out-of-hospital follow-up after low risk breast cancer within a care network: 14-year results
The Breast, ISSN: 0960-9776, Vol: 23, Issue: 4, Page: 407-412
2014
- 4Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The delegation of low-risk breast cancer patients' follow-up to non-hospital practitionners (NHP), including gynaecologists and general practitioners, has been assessed prospectively within a care network in the Paris region. Patients with early stage breast cancer were eligible. The follow-up protocol was built according to international guidelines. By 2012, 289 NHPs were following 2266 patients treated in 11 centres. Median follow-up time was 7.4 years. The mean intervals between two consecutive consultations were 9.5 [9.2–9.8] months for women supposed to be monitored every 6 months and 12.5 [12.2–12.8] for those requiring annual monitoring. The relapse rate was 3.2% [2.1–4.3] at 5 years and 7.8% [5.9–9.7] at 10 years. Seventy one percent of relapses were diagnosed on a scheduled assessment. Only 6% were lost-to-follow-up. Delegating follow-up after low risk breast cancer to NHPs in a care network is feasible, well accepted and provides an alternative to follow-up in specialized centres.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977614000368; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2014.02.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84902553654&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24656635; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960977614000368; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2014.02.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know