Occupational exposures and male breast cancer: A nested case-control study in the Nordic countries
The Breast, ISSN: 0960-9776, Vol: 48, Page: 65-72
2019
- 14Citations
- 37Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef9
- Policy Citations4
- Policy Citation4
- Captures37
- Readers37
- 37
Article Description
Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare and understudied disease. There is limited evidence on association between environmental and occupational agents and MBC. Some similarities in risk factors may be shared with female breast cancer. We evaluated solvents, metals, exhaust gases and other agents in relation to MBC within the large Nordic Occupational Cancer Study (NOCCA). The study included 1469 MBC cases and 7345 controls from Finland, Iceland and Sweden, matched for the date of birth, sex and country. Cases were identified through national cancer registries. Data on occupation and other demographic indicators were collected from census records and population registries. Overall, 24 occupational exposures were assessed. Exposure estimates were assigned by linking job titles to job-exposure matrices (NOCCA-JEM). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated by using conditional logistic regression models. Significantly decreased overall OR was observed for physical workload (OR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.67–0.91). Protective effect of physical workload was stronger by increasing exposure level with significant dose-response relationship (p-trend<0.01). Non-significantly increased ORs were observed for trichloroethylene, iron, lead, chromium, welding fumes and wood dust, and decreased ORs for asbestos, silica dust and perchloroethylene. However, these results were not consistent across all analyses. The current study showed 20–25% protective effect for physical workload at work, while no strong evidence for other agents was observed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977619305533; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.09.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85072260868&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31539869; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960977619305533; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.09.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know