Considering breast density for the classification of benign and malignant mammograms
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, ISSN: 1746-8094, Vol: 67, Page: 102564
2021
- 11Citations
- 33Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Mammography plays a crucial role in breast cancer screening because it can be used to diagnose a breast mass and breast calcification region early. Mammogram has some drawbacks; for example, detecting breast cancer masses in extremely dense breast tissue is considerably difficult. Thus, this study combined breast density with benign and malignant masses to classify breast tumors. This study used data augmentation to preprocess mammograms and then convolutional neural network (CNN) models namely AlexNet, DenseNet, and ShuffleNet to classify the images. The accuracies of the three models before and after data augmentation were compared. Before data augmentation, the accuracies for training and testing sets of AlexNet were 40.47 % and 38.57 %, respectively, those of DenseNet were 90.00 % and 46.39 %, respectively, and those of ShuffleNet were 96.48 % and 42.86 %, respectively. After data augmentation, the accuracies for training and testing sets of AlexNet were 99.35 % and 95.46 %, respectively, those of DenseNet were 99.91 % and 99.72 %, respectively, and those of ShuffleNet were 99.85 % and 97.84 % respectively. Data augmentation allows the model to learn more pictures of different situations and angles to accurately classify new images. Although the accuracy of DenseNet was the highest, the execution time required was considerably longer than that required for ShuffleNet. Considering the accuracy and execution time, ShuffleNet is recommended to be used for the classification of benign and malignant mammography breast tumors.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809421001610; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102564; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105009941&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1746809421001610; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102564
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know