Duration of photoplethysmographic signals for the extraction of Pulse Rate Variability Indices
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, ISSN: 1746-8094, Vol: 80, Page: 104214
2023
- 8Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Pulse rate variability (PRV) assesses the changes in pulse rate through time when pulse rate is extracted from pulsatile signals such as the photoplethysmogram (PPG). PRV has been used as a surrogate of heart rate variability (HRV), but there is evidence of differences between these two variables. It has been hypothesised that these differences may arise from physiological processes or from technical aspects that may affect the reliable extraction of PRV indices from PPG signals. Moreover, there are no guidelines for the extraction of PRV information from pulsatile signals, which hinders the comparison among PRV studies and the understanding of physiological changes that may affect PRV. In this study, the effects of using PPG signals with different duration for the extraction of time-domain, frequency-domain and Poincaré plot indices from PRV was studied. Using simulated PPG signals with known PRV content and varying duration, it was found that PRV indices can be reliably estimated from signals as short as 90 s. This indicates that PRV indices can be extracted from ultra-short PPG signals. Although further validation with real data is needed, it can be concluded that acquiring shorter segments of PPG can be used for PRV analysis, allowing for a more efficient acquisition and processing of this variable.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809422006681; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104214; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85139590604&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1746809422006681; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104214
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know