Interactive interface for spatio-temporal mapping of epileptic human brain using characteristics of high frequency oscillations ( HFOs )
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, ISSN: 1746-8094, Vol: 85, Page: 105041
2023
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Spontaneous High Frequency Oscillations (HFOs) have been considered as emerging specific biomarkers of the epileptogenic region. As a first issue, a significant difference in the implementation of automatic HFOs detection methods can sometimes occur between researchers. In addition, clinicians are not even particularly familiar with the concept of signal and image processing, and programming skills. To overcome these limitations, we propose a plug-and-play interactive Graphical User Interface (GUI) that incorporates an amalgamation of six validated methods used for detecting and quantifying of HFOs events. As a second issue, the most automated HFOs detection methods to date have a high false detection rate and low specificity, ranging, in some cases up to 80% and below 37% respectively. Therefore, the eventual utilization of HFOs detection algorithms in clinical settings requires a checking step to save clinically relevant HFOs and remove spurious oscillations from the detection results. As a last issue addressed in the present study, the major previous HFOs studies have been limited only to the detection and classification of HFOs, but only a few studies have been conducted to efficiently follow the neural dynamics of epileptic focus by studying HFOs characteristics through different brain regions and clinical stages. Therefore, in our software, the brain mapping of HFOs characteristics is done based on the duration, the inter-duration, the average frequency, and the power of HFOs. The present developed software may be considered helpful for understanding the functional significance of HFOs and also to reduce the interaction gap between fundamental research and applied clinical practice related to HFOs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809423004743; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105041; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85159585697&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1746809423004743; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105041
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know