A dynamic ensemble approach based on trend analysis to COVID-19 incidence forecast
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, ISSN: 1746-8094, Vol: 95, Page: 106435
2024
- 8Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures8
- Readers8
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Article Description
Traditional models have struggled to effectively predict COVID-19 incidence time series. Limitation arises from their difficulty in accurately capturing complex behaviors in COVID-19 data, including potential drifts, leading to underperformance in predictive accuracy. In response to this challenge, this paper introduces a novel approach, Dynamic Ensemble Selection based on Trend Classification (DESTC). DESTC addresses the shortcomings of traditional models by dynamically selecting the best specialist models for predicting different concepts within the COVID-19 series. The four main phases of DESTC involve classifying time series instances into trend categories, training ensemble models, evaluating and ranking models for each trend, and selecting the most appropriate models to forecast new test patterns based on their identified trend. Through experimental simulations involving eight datasets, DESTC demonstrated superior performance compared to seventeen literature single and ensemble approaches. These results highlight DESTC as a robust and competitive solution for forecasting COVID-19 incidence time series.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809424004932; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106435; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85194103429&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1746809424004932; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106435
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know