Experimental study on enhancing single-pass air disinfection efficacy for portable disinfection systems with different Far-UVC sources
Building and Environment, ISSN: 0360-1323, Vol: 261, Page: 111742
2024
- 2Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Two single-pass air disinfection systems utilizing different form factors of Far-UVC sources were designed to achieve indoor air disinfection. The first system, namely the external-module-equipped (EME) system, featured a rectangular UV source module attached to the envelope of the disinfection box chamber. The second system, known as the internal-tube-equipped (ITE) system, incorporated a centrally positioned UV tube within the chamber. To assess their air disinfection efficacy, two bacteria, Salmonella enterica and Staphylococcus epidermidis, and one bacteriophage, MS2 were selected as challenges for the systems operating at a flow rate over 100 m 3 /h. The baseline EME system inactivated the microbes with the efficacies of 81.4 %, 16.9 %, and 25.1 % for S. enterica, S. epidermidis, and MS2, respectively. In comparison, the baseline ITE system demonstrated higher inactivation efficacies due to a wider irradiated area, with respective efficacies of 94.4 %, 25.8 %, and 37.8 % for the tested microorganisms. Two enhancement measures were implemented by redirecting airflow to the areas with high UV irradiance and enhancing UV reflectance, increasing the inactivation efficacy of the systems by up to 207.0 %. When tested against Staphylococcus epidermidis, compared with an upper-room Far-UVC, the modified EME and ITE systems presented an increase in inactivation rate by 23.0 % and 29.2 % respectively. These results demonstrated the potential of the systems to efficiently and sustainably inactivate a broad spectrum of microbes in future practical applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132324005845; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111742; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85195459773&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360132324005845; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111742
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know