Évaluation en vie réelle du parcours de soins des patients éligibles à un traitement par axicabtagene ciloleucel : cohorte multicentrique IMPA-CT
Bulletin du Cancer, ISSN: 0007-4551, Vol: 111, Issue: 11, Page: 1020-1029
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
L’arrivée des traitements par CAR-T cells en Europe en 2018 a considérablement modifié la prise en charge des patients atteints d’un lymphome, tant sur le plan clinique qu’organisationnel. Cette étude a pour objectif d’évaluer le parcours des patients éligibles à axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), incluant les étapes en amont et en aval de son administration, peu documentées dans la littérature à ce jour. Une cohorte de 98 patients issus de onze centres qualifiés en France et éligibles à un traitement par axi-cel entre juin 2020 et février 2021 a été constituée rétrospectivement. Parmi l’ensemble des étapes du parcours de soins évaluées, le délai médian observé entre la rechute à la ligne précédente et la prescription d’axi-cel était de 27 jours et le délai médian entre le passage en réunion de concertation pluridisciplinaire et l’administration d’axi-cel était de 63 jours. Les deux principaux modes de sortie d’hospitalisation après réinjection ont été un retour à domicile (65 % des cas) ou une hospitalisation en service de soins de suite et réadaptation (20 % des cas). Parmi l’ensemble des caractéristiques géographiques et organisationnelles évaluées, il n’a pas été mis en évidence de facteurs impactant significativement les délais du parcours de soins, hormis la taille de la file active du centre qualifié et l’origine d’adressage du patient (interne au centre qualifié ou provenant d’un centre adresseur). Depuis la réalisation de l’étude, le nombre d’établissements qualifiés a continué d’augmenter, permettant l’amélioration du maillage territorial et l’accès au traitement. The arrival of CAR-T cell treatments in Europe in 2018 has considerably changed the clinical and logistical management of lymphoma patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate pathways of patients eligible for axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), particularly previously and afterwards of its administration, stages that are currently poorly documented in the literature. Ninety-eight patients from eleven French qualified centers eligible for axi-cel treatment between June 2020 and February 2021 were retrospectively included. Of all the stages in the care pathway evaluated, the median time observed between relapse after the previous line and prescription of axi-cel was 27 days, and the median time between the multidisciplinary consultation meeting and axi-cel administration was 63 days. The two main methods of discharge from hospital were a return home (65% of cases) or hospitalisation in a rehabilitation unit (20% of cases). Among all the geographical and organizational characteristics assessed, no factor was found to have a significant impact on the time length of the patient's journey, apart from the patient capacity of the qualified center, and the origin of the patient's referral (coming from a qualified or a referral center). Since the study was carried out, the number of qualified centers has continued to rise, improving territorial coverage and access to treatment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007455124002868; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.07.010; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85204157629&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39266425; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0007455124002868
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know