A comparison of non-invasive imaging modalities: Infrared thermography, spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis and laser Doppler imaging for the assessment of adult burns
Burns, ISSN: 0305-4179, Vol: 41, Issue: 8, Page: 1695-1707
2015
- 66Citations
- 134Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations66
- Citation Indexes66
- 66
- CrossRef56
- Captures134
- Readers134
- 134
Article Description
Currently, the only evidence-based adjunct to clinical evaluation of burn depth is laser Doppler imaging (LDI), although preliminary studies of alternative imaging modalities with instant image acquisition are promising. This is a study to investigate the accuracy of infrared thermography (IRT) and spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis (SIA) for burn depth assessment, and compare this to the current gold standard: LDI. We include a comparison of the three modalities in terms of cost, reliability and usability.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417915001990; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.06.023; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84945581947&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26421694; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0305417915001990; http://www.burnsjournal.com/article/S0305-4179(15)00199-0/abstract; https://secure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/action/getSharedSiteSession?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.burnsjournal.com%2Farticle%2FS0305-4179%2815%2900199-0%2Fabstract&rc=0&code=jbur-site; http://acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore?return=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSsoCookie%3FredirectUri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.burnsjournal.com%252Faction%252FconsumeSharedSessionAction%253FJSESSIONID%253Daaa_7fsyCzQ04-ZPgjnxv%2526MAID%253DArEdGYcIXsdYInKv9%25252B9EHA%25253D%25253D%2526SERVER%253DWZ6myaEXBLF%25252FdY29RpN4fA%25253D%25253D%2526ORIGIN%253D851575872%2526RD%253DRD; http://acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore/?return=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSsoCookie%3FredirectUri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.burnsjournal.com%252Faction%252FconsumeSharedSessionAction%253FJSESSIONID%253Daaa_7fsyCzQ04-ZPgjnxv%2526MAID%253DArEdGYcIXsdYInKv9%25252B9EHA%25253D%25253D%2526SERVER%253DWZ6myaEXBLF%25252FdY29RpN4fA%25253D%25253D%2526ORIGIN%253D851575872%2526RD%253DRD; https://secure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/action/consumeSsoCookie?redirectUri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.burnsjournal.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSharedSessionAction%3FJSESSIONID%3Daaa_7fsyCzQ04-ZPgjnxv%26MAID%3DArEdGYcIXsdYInKv9%252B9EHA%253D%253D%26SERVER%3DWZ6myaEXBLF%252FdY29RpN4fA%253D%253D%26ORIGIN%3D851575872%26RD%3DRD&acw=&utt=; http://acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore?return=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSsoCookie%3FredirectUri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.burnsjournal.com%252Faction%252FconsumeSharedSessionAction%253FJSESSIONID%253Daaa1_rX_0mDWSfGOjM3xv%2526MAID%253DEgfQ4qc8DfE3JTHw%25252BH63WQ%25253D%25253D%2526SERVER%253DWZ6myaEXBLHj3ZzqSv9HPw%25253D%25253D%2526ORIGIN%253D927860783%2526RD%253DRD; http://acw.elsevier.com/SSOCore/?return=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSsoCookie%3FredirectUri%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.burnsjournal.com%252Faction%252FconsumeSharedSessionAction%253FJSESSIONID%253Daaa1_rX_0mDWSfGOjM3xv%2526MAID%253DEgfQ4qc8DfE3JTHw%25252BH63WQ%25253D%25253D%2526SERVER%253DWZ6myaEXBLHj3ZzqSv9HPw%25253D%25253D%2526ORIGIN%253D927860783%2526RD%253DRD; https://secure.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/action/consumeSsoCookie?redirectUri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.burnsjournal.com%2Faction%2FconsumeSharedSessionAction%3FJSESSIONID%3Daaa1_rX_0mDWSfGOjM3xv%26MAID%3DEgfQ4qc8DfE3JTHw%252BH63WQ%253D%253D%26SERVER%3DWZ6myaEXBLHj3ZzqSv9HPw%253D%253D%26ORIGIN%3D927860783%26RD%3DRD&acw=&utt=
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know