Investigation and assessment of neutrophil dysfunction early after severe burn injury
Burns, ISSN: 0305-4179, Vol: 47, Issue: 8, Page: 1851-1862
2021
- 21Citations
- 30Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations21
- Citation Indexes21
- 21
- CrossRef1
- Captures30
- Readers30
- 30
Article Description
Extensive burn injury results in a complex immune response that is associated with mortality and prognosis. Studies on acquired immune and the development of sepsis in burn patients have been reported. However, one of the main cells in innate immune, neutrophil dysfunction in the burn shock stage has not been thoroughly characterized. Neutrophil chemotaxis, expression of neutrophil surface markers (P2X1 receptor, [P2RX1]), degranulation (myeloperoxidase [MPO], heparin-binding protein [HBP], matrix metalloproteinase-9 [MMP-9] and neutrophil elastase [NE]), oxidative burst capacity, neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) generation, phagocytosis and apoptosis were measured in 18 patients with major burns (≥30% total body surface area [TBSA]) within 48 h after burn injury. In addition, circulating neutrophils and vascular permeability in mice model with 30% TBSA third-degree burns were also observed and investigated. Neutrophil functions were reduced considerably in burn shock stage, which was characterized by decreased chemotaxis, phagocytosis and abnormal bactericidal function. Increased release of heparin-binding protein (HBP) and the expression of P2RX1 on the neutrophil surface are related to fluid leakage and decreased chemotaxis during burn shock stage, respectively. The combination of HBP concentration in plasma and P2RX1 expression on neutrophils gives a better prediction of neutrophil dysfunction in burn-injured patients. Neutrophil dysfunction plays a key role in the development of burn injury. Targeting the restoration of neutrophil function may be a feasible therapeutic intervention to help reduce fluid loss during shock and the severity of subsequent infection.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417921000401; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2021.02.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103707822&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33820675; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0305417921000401; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2021.02.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know