Polyhedral finite elements for nonlinear solid mechanics using tetrahedral subdivisions and dual-cell aggregation
Computer Aided Geometric Design, ISSN: 0167-8396, Vol: 77, Page: 101812
2020
- 12Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
General polyhedral discretizations offer several advantages over classical approaches consisting of standard tetrahedra and hexahedra. These include increased flexibility and robustness in the meshing of geometrically complex domains and higher-quality solutions for both finite element and finite volume schemes. Currently, the use of general polyhedra is hampered by the lack of general-purpose polyhedral meshing algorithms and software. One approach for generating polyhedral meshes is the use of tetrahedral subdivisions and dual-cell aggregation. In this approach, each tetrahedron of an existing tetrahedral mesh is subdivided using one of several subdivision schemes. Polyhedral-dual cells may then be formed and formulated as finite elements with shape functions obtained through the use of generalized barycentric coordinates. We explore the use of dual-cell discretizations for applications in nonlinear solid mechanics using a displacement-based finite element formulation. Verification examples are presented that yield optimal rates of convergence. Accuracy of the methodology is demonstrated via several nonlinear examples that include large deformation and plasticity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167839619301219; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cagd.2019.101812; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077692153&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167839619301219; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167839619301219?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167839619301219?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cagd.2019.101812
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know