Portfolio-consumption choice problem with voluntary retirement and consumption constraints
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, ISSN: 0377-0427, Vol: 445, Page: 115839
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We study the investment–consumption choice problem with voluntary retirement and upside/downside consumption constraints in infinite horizon, which can be formulated as a two-phase mixed stochastic control problem including stopping time coupled with controls. By verification theorem, we show the strong solution of a fully nonlinear differential variational inequality, satisfying some special properties, is the value function of this problem. Then we eliminate the nonlinearity through Legendre transformation, and obtain the closed-form formulas of the optimal investment–consumption feedback strategy, the optimal retirement strategy and the value function by solving the dual equation. Since the introduction of consumption constraints, these formulas are both segmented and semi-explicit, and bring certain difficulties to the analysis of the properties of the optimal strategies and the value function. The regularity of the feedback strategy and the value function are obtained, as well as their monotonicity or non-monotonicity with respect to various parameters are discussed by some stochastic analysis methods and differential equation techniques.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377042724000888; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2024.115839; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85185535567&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0377042724000888; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2024.115839
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know