Interaction mechanisms of antibiotic sulfamethoxazole with various graphene-based materials and multiwall carbon nanotubes and the effect of humic acid in water
Carbon, ISSN: 0008-6223, Vol: 114, Page: 671-678
2017
- 90Citations
- 81Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We studied the interaction mechanisms between carbonaceous nanomaterials (CNMs) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) to elucidate their adsorption behaviors. Three graphene-based materials, reduced graphene oxide (rGO), graphene oxide (GO), and graphene nanoplatelet pastes (GNP), and five multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), MWCNT10, MWCNT15, MWCNT15-OH, MWCNT15-COOH, and N-doped MWCNTs, were used as sorbents. Oxygen-containing functional groups and graphene wrinkling suppressed SMX adsorption on GO and GNPs due to fewer Csp 2 ring sites for π-π stacking and fewer accessible flat surface adsorption sites, respectively. Ring current-induced 1 H NMR upfield chemical shifts increased as the π-donor concentration increased, as well as π-donor strength of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (pyrene > phenanthrene > naphthalene) as model graphene compounds, suggesting that π-π interaction strength of SMX with PAHs associated with π-donor strength. Moreover, 1 H NMR results further verified that carboxylic and hydroxyl groups in PAHs (9-phenanthrol and 3-phenanthrenecarboxylic acid) weakened the complexation between SMX and the graphitic surface. Additionally, the morphologies of rGO and MWCNT10 were observed using AFM, and transformed from being linear to scattered as the loading dose of the humic acid increased. Our results are useful to understand the distinct interaction mechanisms and subsequent adsorption behaviors resulting from various carbon nanomaterials with SMX in water.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008622316311575; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.080; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85007486323&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0008622316311575; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0008622316311575?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0008622316311575?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.080
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know