The interrelation between landform, land-use, erosion and soil quality in the Kan catchment of the Tehran province, central Iran
CATENA, ISSN: 0341-8162, Vol: 204, Page: 105412
2021
- 40Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The objective of this study was to better understand the functional links between soil quality, erosion, geomorphology and land-use. This was done for the Kan catchment of the Tehran province, central Iran. Soil quality was assessed by using the integrated quality index (IQI) and the Nemoro quality index (NQI): this enabled the total and minimum datasets (TDS) to be obtained by using the principal component analysis. Soil erosion was calculated using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) model using the InVEST software. The calculated erosion rates are very high (on average 7 t ha −1 yr −1 ) in the region due to the variety of topography, steep slopes and lack of suitable vegetation. The variety of topography and steep slopes are a caused by the high uplift rates. Consequently, the modelled actual erosion rates are in the same order of magnitude as measured, long-term denudation rates ( 10 Be). The erosion rates in the rangeland were higher than in agriculture land and built-up areas and exhibit a positive correlation with elevation and slope angle. The integrated soil quality index produced more plausible results than the NQI. According to the IQI, the soils in the study area mostly have a moderate to low quality. The statistical analyses showed that organic matter and sand play a more important role on the soil quality than all the other soil characteristics. Slope and elevation seem to significantly influence the soil quality. We demonstrated that soil quality can be evaluated precisely enough by using the minimum dataset (which reduces costs and time) and that it is dependent only on a few soil parameters. Soil quality and erosion rates vary strongly in areas having a rough and steep topography and the effect of land-use is partially overshadowed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181622100271X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105412; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105282000&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S034181622100271X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105412
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know