Spatial prioritization of wind-erosion-prone areas in the dried-up beds of Lake Urmia; using field sampling and in-vitro measurement
CATENA, ISSN: 0341-8162, Vol: 217, Page: 106507
2022
- 5Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Preparing wind erosion susceptibility maps and prioritizing the susceptible areas in the dried-up lakebeds is essential through field sampling data and in-vitro measurement, which has so far received less attention. Accordingly, this study aimed to identify and prioritize the wind-erosion-prone dried-up beds of Lake Urmia, Iran. Therefore, 190 composite soil samples (from 1520 points) were taken. Then the soil texture, organic matter (OM), and calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) content of the samples were measured. Afterward, the equation-based wind-erodible fraction of soil (EF-e) and soil crust factor (SCF) were used to calculate the wind-erosion susceptibility. Sieving-based wind-erodible fraction of soil (EF-s) obtained from the flat sieve. Wind-induced soil loss (WE) measured using a fixed wind tunnel to validate the results of EF-e, SCF and EF-s methods. Then, the spatial distribution maps of EF-e, EFs, SCF and WE values, and OM and CaCO 3 content in the non-sampled beds were estimated using the ordinary Kriging method. The results indicated that, in the dried-up beds of Lake Urmia, the EF-e, EF-s, SCF and WE indices varied from 1% to 55.98%, 4.16% to 55.25%, 0.034 to 0.996, and 1.27 to 15.56 g m −2 min −1, respectively. There was a strong significant correlation (P < 0.01) between EF-e and EF-s with WE. The high content of CaCO 3 had the most effect on decreasing the susceptibility to wind erosion on the dried-up beds of Lake Urmia. We also found that the dried-up beds located in the southeastern (WE = 9.03–15.56 g m −2 min −1 ) and northwestern (WE = 7.89–15.56 g m −2 min −1 ) parts of Lake Urmia had the highest susceptibility to wind erosion. In addition, the southwestern (WE = 5.72–7.89 g m −2 min −1 ) of Lake Urmia had the lowest susceptibility. The technical and managerial measures can be developed the priorities highlighted in this study to stabilize dust-salt hotspots in the dried-up beds of Lake Urmia.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816222004933; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106507; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133226541&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0341816222004933; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106507
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know