The coupling between iron and carbon and iron reducing bacteria control carbon sequestration in paddy soils
CATENA, ISSN: 0341-8162, Vol: 223, Page: 106937
2023
- 9Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The coupling between iron (Fe) and carbon (C) and the activity of Fe reducing bacteria (FeRB) can strongly affect C sequestration in paddy soils. Although the geochemical cycling of C and Fe has been reported at individual sites, a lack of information exists across soil types and regions. In this study, we investigated the coupling of Fe-C and the role of FeRB across five contrasting paddy soils, which account for 60 % of China’s rice cultivation area: Haplic Solonchaks (SCh), Calcaric Fluvisols in Henan (FLc1) and in Tianjin (FLc2), Cumulic Anthrosols (ATc), and Eutric Cambisols (CMe). ATc and CMe were in oxidizing environments and contained significantly higher Fe (III), free Fe oxide (Fe d ), amorphous Fe oxide (Fe o ), and organic matter complexed iron oxides (Fe p ) than SCh, FLc1, and FLc2 which were in reducing environments with higher relative abundance of FeRB. Nonmetric multidimensional scale analysis (NMDS) demonstrated the variability of FeRB in different soil types (r = 0.928, P = 0.001 ). The higher Fe-soil organic carbon (Fe-SOC) in CMe (2.27 g kg −1 ; 2.72 g kg −1 ) and ATc (1.32 g kg −1 ; 1.6 g kg −1 ) was likely due to the complexation of Fe (III) and its oxides within SOC and minimal dissimilatory Fe reduction. The existence of the “iron gate” in ATc and CMe also revealed the inhibitory effect of low quantities of Fe (II) on phenol oxidase (PO) enzyme activity and SOC mineralization. According to canonical correspondence analysis (CCA), our study indicates the importance of DOC aromaticity as characterized by UV light absorption at 254 nm (SUV 254 ) (16.6 %), Fe d (10.9 %), Fe o (9.2 %) to FeRB. Moreover, the structural equation model (SEM) further revealed that SOC and DOC were regulated by PO activity, Fe, and FeRB (χ 2 = 7.002, P = 0.536). Our study highlights the importance of soil characteristics on Fe-C coupling in the biogeochemical cycle through interactions among Fe morphology and microorganisms via different oxidation–reduction conditions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816223000280; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.106937; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85146625120&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0341816223000280; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.106937
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know