Effects of soil erosion–deposition on corn yields in the Chinese Mollisol region
CATENA, ISSN: 0341-8162, Vol: 240, Page: 108001
2024
- 4Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Soil erosion is a major challenge for crop production maintenance and improvement in agricultural regions worldwide. However, quantifying the impacts of soil erosion rate on crop yield has not been carried out often, and there are few reports on impacts of soil deposition crop yields, especially in the Chinese Mollisol Region. Thus, this study quantified soil erosion–deposition rates (SEDRs) at three agricultural catchments in the Chinese Mollisol region using the 137 Cs technique and assessed soil erosion–deposition impacts on corn ( Zea mays L. ) yield. The results showed that SEDRs varied from −5471.7 (deposition) to 9956.0 (erosion) t km −2 yr −1. The distributions of both soil erosion and deposition in the three catchments were in coexistence, but soil erosion was dominant. In addition, above 2500 t km −2 yr −1 of soil erosion rates (larger than slight erosion rates) in the three catchments accounted for 41.0 %, indicating that soil erosion was severe. Moreover, corn yields in the three catchments ranged from 1.9 to 14.6 t ha −1. Compared with deposited sites, corn yields in eroded sites were 19.2 %–40.6 % lower. Furthermore, when soil erosion rates were moderate (2500–5000 t km −2 yr −1 ), corn yields were 32.4 % lower than those in non-eroded sites. The spatial distribution of corn yield was opposite to that of soil erosion rate at catchment and slope scales. The relationship between corn yields and soil erosion rates had a negative linear relationship ( p < 0.01), which was validated with acceptable accuracy. There was a positive linear relationship between corn yields and soil deposition rates without statistical significance ( p > 0.05). These findings are valuable for assessing how soil erosion–deposition affects crop yields to implement countermeasures for controlling soil erosion and maintaining sustainable agricultural development.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181622400198X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189561032&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S034181622400198X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108001
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know