Direct epoxidation of propylene with molecular oxygen over Ag–MoO 3 /ZrO 2 catalyst
Catalysis Today, ISSN: 0920-5861, Vol: 93, Page: 173-182
2004
- 53Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Direct gas-phase epoxidation of propylene to propylene oxide (PO) by molecular oxygen was studied over the MoO 3 -modified supported-silver catalyst. The effect of promoter and support on the performance of the Ag–MoO 3 catalyst and their role were investigated by XPS, XRD, SEM, BET surface area, NH 3 -TPD, CO 2 -TPD techniques and so on. As the promoter, MoO 3 plays a great role of electron- and structure-type bi-functional promoter. Of all the supports studied, ZrO 2 is the most suitable one for the Ag–MoO 3 catalyst. The presence of support can regulate the size of the Ag–MoO 3 particles and the pore radii of catalyst, and decrease the loading of MoO 3 from ∼50 wt.% in the unsupported Ag–MoO 3 catalyst to ∼4 wt.% in the Ag–MoO 3 /ZrO 2 catalyst. The properly weak Lewis acidic sites, the larger size of the Ag–MoO 3 particles and pore channel on the Ag–MoO 3 /ZrO 2 catalyst are beneficial to improve epoxidation performance of the catalyst. The effect of the reaction temperature and space velocity on the catalytic epoxidation of propylene was also investigated. The low temperature or high space velocity can decrease the deep oxidation of propylene oxide to improve the selectivity to PO. Over the 20%Ag–4%MoO 3 /ZrO 2 catalyst at 400 °C, 0.1 MPa and space velocity of 7500 h −1, the selectivity to PO of 60.3% was achieved with the O 2 conversion of 4.8%; under the space velocity of 12 000 h −1, the selectivity to PO was 71.5% with 2.5% O 2 conversion.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920586104002664; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.038; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=4344595252&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0920586104002664; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.038
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know