Preclinical toxicity of innovative molecules: In vitro , in vivo and metabolism prediction
Chemico-Biological Interactions, ISSN: 0009-2797, Vol: 315, Page: 108896
2020
- 22Citations
- 49Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef13
- Captures49
- Readers49
- 49
Article Description
The lack of predictivity of animal's models has increased the failure rate of drug candidates. Thus, the reversion of this scenario using preliminary in vitro assays and metabolism prediction can reduce the unnecessary use of animals, as well as predict toxic effects at preclinical and clinical stages. The present study aimed to evaluate safety of four biologically active molecules (RN104, RI78, ICH, PCH) with potential therapeutic applications synthesized in our laboratory. Initially, we used MTT cytotoxicity against A549, H9C2, HepG2, LLC-PK1 and NEURO-2 cell lines. RN104 showed the lowest cytotoxicity and further studies were conducted with it. The neutral red (NR) test was performed according to OECD-129 and then acute toxicity test (OECD-423). According to NR results we administered at 300 mg/kg on animals; however, no toxic effect was observed, while 2,000 mg/kg resulted in the death of one animal per group. After, metabolism prediction studies, performed using both ligand-based and structure-based, suggests three potential metabolites. In silico results suggested that potential metabolites could be fast eliminated and, then, this could be an explanation for lower observed toxicity in in vivo experiments. The results showed limitations of the NR as a predictor of the initial dose for the acute toxicity study, which may be related to metabolism. Therefore, the combination of theoretical and experimental studies is relevant to a general understanding of new molecule's toxicity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000927971931422X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2019.108896; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075534516&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31743685; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000927971931422X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2019.108896
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know