Biological variation: Evaluation of methods for constructing confidence intervals for estimates of within-person biological variation for different distributions of the within-person effect
Clinica Chimica Acta, ISSN: 0009-8981, Vol: 468, Page: 166-173
2017
- 12Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- CrossRef12
- 11
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
Precise estimates of the within-person biological variation, CV I, can be essential both for monitoring patients and for setting analytical performance specifications. The confidence interval, CI, may be used to evaluate the reliability of an estimate, as it is a good measure of the uncertainty of the estimated CV I. The aim of the present study is to evaluate and establish methods for constructing a CI with the correct coverage probability and non-cover probability when estimating CV I.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898117300736; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2017.02.021; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85014668306&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28257883; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0009898117300736; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2017.02.021
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know