Research progress of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on aerosol collection and detection
Chinese Chemical Letters, ISSN: 1001-8417, Vol: 35, Issue: 1, Page: 108378
2024
- 7Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- Captures5
- Readers5
Review Description
The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in late 2019 has negatively affected people's lives and productivity. Because the mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is of great concern, this review discusses the sources of virus aerosols and possible transmission routes. First, we discuss virus aerosol collection methods, including natural sedimentation, solid impact, liquid impact, centrifugal, cyclone and electrostatic adsorption methods. Then, we review common virus aerosol detection methods, including virus culture, metabolic detection, nucleic acid-based detection and immunology-based detection methods. Finally, possible solutions for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 aerosols are introduced. Point-of-care testing has long been a focus of attention. In the near future, the development of an instrument that integrates sampling and output results will enable the real-time, automatic monitoring of patients.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001841723002322; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108378; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85174713880&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37362323; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1001841723002322; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=7690352&internal_id=7690352&from=elsevier; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108378
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know