Predictors of premature termination and completion of randomized controlled trials
Contemporary Clinical Trials, ISSN: 1551-7144, Vol: 130, Page: 107219
2023
- 1Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have a key role in progressing biomedical research and guiding clinical decision making, but premature termination remains high (up to 30%), raising concerns regarding funding expenditure and resource allocation. This brief report sought to identify variables associated with RCTs' premature termination and completion.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714423001428; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2023.107219; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85159049682&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37156372; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1551714423001428; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2023.107219
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know