Quantification of the Relationship of Pyridoxine and Spirometry Measurements in the United States Population
Current Developments in Nutrition, ISSN: 2475-2991, Vol: 7, Issue: 8, Page: 100078
2023
- 3Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef1
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
There has been evidence to suggest associations between vitamins and lung function. This study aimed to examine the association between vitamin B6 and spirometry values. A cross-sectional study was done using National Health and Nutritional Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2007–2012, which is a nationally representative, modern cohort. Spirometry, a clinical pulmonary function test, measured the amount and speed of air a person could exhale after taking the deepest possible breath after forceful expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). After determination of the relationship of the linearity of variables, univariable and multivariable models were fitted to investigate the effect of vitamin B6 on FEV1 and FVC. The National Center for Health Statistics Ethics Review Board granted permission for the study’s data collection and analysis. Of 19,160 individuals who had complete information on vitamin B6 intake, FEV1, and FVC, it was found each mg of vitamin B6 intake was associated with increase in 166.41 mL of FEV1 (95% CI: 156.71, 176.12; P < 0.01) and 221.6 mL of FVC (95% CI: 209.62, 233.57; P < 0.01). After controlling for potential confounders (age, race, sex, body mass index, education, and income), multiple linear regression found that each mg of vitamin B6 was associated with increase in 25.98 mL of FEV1 (95% CI: 19.15, 32.80, P < 0.01) and 38.97 mL of FVC (95% CI: 30.65, 47.30, P < 0.01). Increased vitamin B6 intake is associated with improvement in lung function. Further prospective studies are required to ascertain whether increased vitamin B6 can lead to increased long-term spirometry measurements and the specific therapeutic dose–response relationship.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299123212512; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100078; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85166016561&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37529119; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2475299123212512; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100078
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know