Viruses and endosome membrane dynamics
Current Opinion in Cell Biology, ISSN: 0955-0674, Vol: 21, Issue: 4, Page: 582-588
2009
- 45Citations
- 83Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations45
- Citation Indexes45
- 45
- CrossRef38
- Captures83
- Readers83
- 83
Review Description
Cell surface molecules, ligands, and solutes can be endocytosed into animal cells via several pathways in addition to clathrin-mediated endocytosis, which all seem to lead to canonical endosomes. It seems that viruses can enter and infect cells through most of, if not all, endocytic routes, having evolved different, sometimes elaborate, strategies to (mis)use cellular machineries to their own benefit during infection. In this short review, I will discuss recent progress in understanding the pathways followed by animal viruses into cells, and how these studies are also providing novel insights into our understanding of some molecular mechanisms that control endocytic membrane transport.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095506740900091X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.03.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67949124782&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19443190; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S095506740900091X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.03.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know