Binary sacrificial anodes using transition metals (M + Fe, M = Ni, Cu, Zn) for electrocoagulation of boron and recovery of magnetic spinel oxides
Chemical Engineering Journal, ISSN: 1385-8947, Vol: 461, Page: 142148
2023
- 7Citations
- 7Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Researchers from National Sun Yat-Sen University Report on Findings in Engineering [Binary Sacrificial Anodes Using Transition Metals (M Plus Fe, M = Ni, Cu, Zn) for Electrocoagulation of Boron and Recovery of Magnetic Spinel Oxides]
2023 APR 13 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Taiwan Daily Report -- Research findings on Engineering are discussed in a new
Article Description
Electrocoagulation (EC) using metals Fe, Cu, Ni, Zn, and Al as sacrificial anodes was performed for boron removal. Boron (B) was efficiently swept by the EC sludge that could be recovered as spinel oxides when combined the two anodes, Cu + Fe, Ni + Fe, Zn + Fe, and Ni + Al, and Al cathode. Effects of EC conditions, such as applied current, pH, initial concentration, on the faradaic efficiency, energy consumption, and B removal were investigated. A consecutive kinetic model was proposed to evaluate the rates of coagulation and metal dissolution as affected by the metal type and current density. The coagulant generated during EC was magnetic ferrites, including CuFe 2 O 4 (20.23 emu g −1 ), NiFe 2 O 4 (51 emu g −1 ), and ZnFe 2 O 4 (6.54 emu g −1 ) (emu = electromagnetic unit), depending on the type of two anodes. The dissolution potential (i.e., open circuit potential) of metals influenced the sludge formation under constant current, while the electrostatic interactions between the sludge and B were the determining factor in the EC efficacy. EC was optimized at pH where the positively charged coagulants tended to trap boron oxyanions (B(OH) 4 − ). Among combined metals, EC sludge of Ni + Fe and Ni + Al had relatively high coagulation capacity due to the high pH pzc, which obtained higher than 90% removal ([B] 0 = 100 mg L −1 ) at 12.5 mA cm −2 in one hour.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385894723008793; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.142148; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85149247013&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1385894723008793; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.142148
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know