Primate neuronal connections are sparse in cortex as compared to mouse
Cell Reports, ISSN: 2211-1247, Vol: 36, Issue: 11, Page: 109709
2021
- 23Citations
- 69Captures
- 14Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef2
- Captures69
- Readers69
- 69
- Mentions14
- News Mentions14
- 14
Most Recent News
科学家惊奇地发现灵长类神经元在视觉皮层中的突触比小鼠少
一项分析猕猴和小鼠个体突触的研究表明,灵长类神经元在视觉皮层的突触比小鼠少 2 到 5 倍。 芝加哥大学和阿贡国家实验室的一项研究分析了猕猴和小鼠超过 15000 个单独的突触,发现灵长类神经元在视觉皮层的突触比小鼠少 2 到 5 倍——这一差异可能是由于维持突触的代谢成本。 灵长类动物通常被认为比老鼠聪明。但在一个令人惊讶的发现中,芝加哥大学和阿贡国家实验室的神经科学研究人员发现,老鼠大脑中连接神经元的突触实际上更多。 在一项比较猕猴和小鼠大脑突触水平的研究中,研究人员发现,与啮齿动物相比,灵长类动物的每个神经元的突触要少得多,无论是在初级视觉皮层 2/3 层的兴奋性神经元还是抑制性神经元。利用人工循环神经网络模型,该团队进一步能够确定,构建和维持突触的代谢成本可能会促使更大的神经网络变得更稀疏,正如在灵长类和小鼠神经元中看到的那样。研究结果于 2021 年 9 月 14 日发表在《细胞
Article Description
Detailing how primate and mouse neurons differ is critical for creating generalized models of how neurons process information. We reconstruct 15,748 synapses in adult Rhesus macaques and mice and ask how connectivity differs on identified cell types in layer 2/3 of primary visual cortex. Primate excitatory and inhibitory neurons receive 2–5 times fewer excitatory and inhibitory synapses than similar mouse neurons. Primate excitatory neurons have lower excitatory-to-inhibitory (E/I) ratios than mouse but similar E/I ratios in inhibitory neurons. In both species, properties of inhibitory axons such as synapse size and frequency are unchanged, and inhibitory innervation of excitatory neurons is local and specific. Using artificial recurrent neural networks (RNNs) optimized for different cognitive tasks, we find that penalizing networks for creating and maintaining synapses, as opposed to neuronal firing, reduces the number of connections per node as the number of nodes increases, similar to primate neurons compared with mice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211124721011566; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109709; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114781302&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34525373; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211124721011566; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109709; https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(21)01156-6?dgcid=raven_jbs_etoc_email; http://www.cell.com/article/S2211124721011566/abstract; http://www.cell.com/article/S2211124721011566/fulltext; http://www.cell.com/article/S2211124721011566/pdf; https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/abstract/S2211-1247(21)01156-6; https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(21)01156-6; https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(21)01156-6#.YUDM0I7JjBM.twitter; https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(21)01156-6?rss=yes&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter; https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(21)01156-6?dgcid=raven_jbs_etoc_email#.YUEdhHho95s.twitter
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know